Paper submitted to "GSA
Bulletin" Revision Date:
11/16/82
Mudflow deposition and horizonation in
Holocene soils near Point Conception, California
Glenn Borchardt, Salem Rice
California Division of Mines and Geology, Ferry Building,
San Francisco, California 94111
Jerome Treiman
California Division of Mines and Geology, 107 S. Broadway,
Los Angeles, California 90012
ABSTRACT
Trenching at the site of the proposed LNG (liquefied natural
gas) terminal near Point Conception
revealed much detail
regarding late Quaternary
continental deposition along uplifted
marine terraces. The uppermost unit at the site is a
distinctive
light gray (10YR6/1d) loam which is
up to 60 cm thick. The unit
forms an abrupt contact with an
underlying very dark grayish
brown (10YR3/2d) clay soil
horizon. The origin of the light gray
loam is a matter of some
controversy in dating the age of latest
fault movement. It is either an A2 soil horizon formed
mostly as
a result of pedogenesis during the
last 10,000 years, an aeolian
deposit accumulating since the last
high stand of the sea about
5,000 years ago, or a young mudflow
about 1,000 years old.
We support the mudflow interpretation because: 1) the unit
is absent from localities where its
deposition would have been
interrupted by an intervening drainage
way, 2) the unit contains
pebbles and cobbles, 3) its
thickness bears little relation to
the thickness of what we believe to
be an underlying vertisol
(expansive soil), and 4) the
mineralogy of the mudflow and the
vertisol indicates little pedogenic
relationship between them.
Soil development within the mudflow is about 10% of that in
the vertisol, which began
developing between 8,000 and 12,000
years ago. Thrust faults at the site do not cut the
mudflow, and
at one exposure a shallow
equivalent of the vertisol is absent on
the headwall of a fault. Thus the latest fault movement at the
site occurred prior to mudflow
deposition about 1,000 years ago.
INTRODUCTION
Investigations of the seismic safety of the proposed LNG
terminal near Point Conception,
California (Figs. 1, 2), have
developed much detailed information
concerning late Quaternary
deposition on uplifted marine
terraces associated with
neotectonism of the Transverse
Ranges (Dames & Moore, 1980; Rice
and others, 1982). The uppermost unit, dubbed the "gray
layer"
for purposes of discussion, is a
distinctive light gray
(10YR6/1d) loam, up to 60 cm thick
and forming an abrupt contact
with an underlying very dark
grayish brown (10YR3/2d) clay soil
horizon (Figs. 3, 4). The origin of the light gray loam is a
matter of some controversy in
dating the age of latest fault
movement because it is the youngest
unit not displaced by
faulting. It is either an A2 soil horizon formed primarily
through pedogenesis during the last
10,000 years, an aeolian
deposit accumulated since the last
high stand of the sea about
5,000 years ago, or a young mudflow
deposit less than 1,000 years
old. The origin of the gray layer is important, not only for
dating the most recent movements on
the bedding-plane thrust
faults at the site, but also for
developing techniques for
distinguishing between pedogenic,
aeolian, and fluvial features.
Description of the Gray Layer
Detailed descriptions of the gray layer and the underlying
soil horizons have been given for
the "Beach Fault" trench soil
excavated at the LNG site (Johnson,
1981, p. 33) and for the
Concepcion1 soil series
described at a locality on Hollister
Ranch about 4 km to the east
(Shipman, Rabey, and Mann, 1981, p.
20). Unfortunately, neither of these recognizes the two-story
nature of the alluvial deposition
and of the soil. A generalized
description, complete with the
genetic interpretations of our
study, is given in Table 1. In brief, we consider the gray layer
to be a mudflow fan which was
deposited about 1,000 years ago on
the weakly-dissected surface of a
vertisol (Borchardt, 1977) that
had been forming since the end of
the Pleistocene. The
characteristics of these two units
indicate that the gray layer
is indeed a young mudflow.
_______________
1Spelling used by Shipman, Rabey,
and Mann (1981) as well as
Johnson (1981).
Hypothesis No. 1: PEDOGENESIS
In the forests of northern climes, particularly in
Wisconsin, Minnesota, and France,
there arises a soil horizon,
light gray in color, eluviated of
its inherited clays, and
leached of free iron oxides (Soil
Survey Staff, 1975, p. 506,
Plates 4C and 6D). In the ideal case, this horizon, properly
designated an A2 or albic horizon,
forms when organic chelates
reduce the iron in the layer and
move together with the iron to
reprecipitate as a Bhir horizon at
some lower depth. By this
process--one that is entirely
pedogenic—the original colors of
the sand and silt grains are
recovered from the parent material
and the horizon appears gray or
white. According to Soil
Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff, 1975,
p. 44), intervenor in these
matters: "The albic horizon is
one from which clay and free iron
oxides have been
removed."
They go on to caution, however, that "Deep deposits of
pure
white sand can be formed by wind or
wave action. Although these
deposits have the apparent
morphology of an albic horizon, they
are in fact parent material. The white sand in such a deposit
does not overlie a B horizon or any
other soil horizon except, in
some places, a buried soil"
(Soil Survey Staff, 1975, p. 44). We
contend that the gray layer that
forms the upper portion of the
Concepcion soil is an analogous
parent material, in contradiction
of the interpretations of Shipman,
Rabey, and Mann (1981, p. 20)
and Johnson (1981). We agree with Shlemon (1980) that the gray
layer is a young mudflow, but do
not agree that it should be
considered an albic horizon.
Physical and Chemical Analysis
The excellent detailed work of Johnson (1981) affords us an
opportunity to review some of the
laboratory data which show the
two-story nature of the Concepcion
soil. Particle size analyses
provide an excellent means for
detecting soil horizons derived
from two or more parent materials (Borchardt,
Hole, and Jackson,
1968; Borchardt and Hill,
1982).
In the "Beach Fault" trench (Fig. 3), depth
functions for
sand, silt, and clay show little
change within the gray layer,
while clay contents decrease with
depth in the vertisol below it
(Fig. 5). Nearly vertical depth functions are indicative of
minimal exposure to soil
development, and in this case, the
rather uniform content of 20% clay
in the gray layer also
contradicts the claim that its
lower portion is an eluvial
horizon--one from which clay has
been removed through
pedogenesis. Thin sections prepared from the lower
portion of
the gray layer show "abundant,
very small iron concretions and
films (ferrans) plus a few
argillans [clay films]" (Johnson,
1981, p. 9). The concretions are a clue to why the
mudflow
remains gray: it is subject to poor
drainage produced by the
clayey vertisol upon which it was
deposited. The argillans
indicate that this young deposit is
currently undergoing
incipient illuviation rather than
longstanding eluviation. The
so-called albic horizon in the
Concepcion soil is not a zone of
significant iron removal, but one
of periodic iron solubilization
and reprecipitation occurring more
or less in situ.
Johnson (1981, p. 15) found that over 15% of the cation
exchange capacity (CEC) within the
buried vertisol was occupied
by sodium (Fig. 6). Soluble salts were absent in the gray layer,
but increased dramatically with
depth within the vertisol. Total
sodium was about 150 ppm in the
gray layer, whereas it was about
1500 ppm in the vertisol. We believe that, because most of this
sodium is probably oceanic, the
amount of sodium present is a
fair indicator of the duration of aerial
exposure to sea spray
and other forms of salt-laden
precipitation. In young soils near
the coast, sodium thus can serve as
a chronometer. According to
this “sodium chronometer”, the
vertisol is at least ten times older
than the gray layer above it.
The x-ray diffraction patterns of the clay fraction also
demonstrate that the Concepcion
soil is a two-story soil (Fig.
7). Being derived from mudflows and alluvial fan materials from
the same source in the Santa Ynez
Mountains, clays from both the
gray layer and the vertisol contain
quartz, kaolinite, and mica.
The kaolinite and mica is probably
inherited from the well-
drained soils of the uplands, while
the poorly crystalline
smectite predominant in the
vertisol may have formed in situ.
Kaolinite and mica increase with
depth in the gray layer and in
the vertisol (Fig. 7), behaving as
if each had been weathered or
diluted by other minerals during
two different periods of aerial
exposure. Of all the horizons examined, the greatest contrast in
mineralogy exists between the
bottom of the gray layer and the
top of the vertisol. This is a likely result of geologic
deposition rather than of pedogenic
translocation.
Lastly, if the vertisol was a product of clay eluviation
from the gray layer, then wherever
the gray layer is especially
thick we would expect to find an
especially thick vertisol
beneath it. There are numerous exposures near Point
Conception
where precisely the opposite is the
case (Fig. 8). Regardless of
the nomenclature used to describe
it, the primary characteristics
of the gray layer did not originate
through significant
pedogenesis.
Hypothesis No. 2: AEOLIAN DEPOSITION
Yerkes, Greene, Tinsley, and Lajoie (1981, p. 5)
hypothesized an aeolian origin for
the gray layer. They assigned
it a maximum age of 5,000 B.P.
based upon Recent sea level
changes and guessed that it was
still accumulating today. They
correctly recognized that the unit
had very little soil
development and that it was the
only one not displaced by bedding
plane faults at the site.
The case against the aeolian hypothesis was made earlier by
Shlemon (1978, p. A-7), who pointed
out that the gray layer "does
not pervasively blanket the modern
surface, but rather occupies
topographic lows," contains
lag gravels, and has no easily
recognizable aeolian source. Indeed, subsequent excavations for
an LNG tank site uncovered a local,
but laterally extensive layer
of angular cobbles near the base of
the gray layer (Fig. 9).
These were at first thought to be
of archeological significance,
but no artifacts were found in
direct association with the
cobbles (Ancient Enterprises, Inc.,
1981). To those upholding
either the pedogenesis or the
aeolian hypothesis, this cobble
layer was disturbingly anomalous,
even though Johnson and
Rockwell (1982) did propose a novel
combination of anthropogenic
and biogenic forces to explain its
presence. Although faunal
turbation is common in soils (Wood
and Johnson, 1978), a more
likely explanation is that the
cobble layer is an instance of the
sporadic occurrence of lag gravel
and angular cobble in what are
otherwise fine-grained mudflows.
Hypothesis No. 3: MUDFLOW DEPOSITION
Marine terrace deposits near Point Conception accumulate
primarily by alluvial fan
deposition upon uplifted wave-cut
platforms (Dames & Moore, 1980;
Rice and others, 1982). Although
much of this material consists of
coarse gravels and sands
deposited in the high-energy
environment of the late Pleistocene,
the fine-grained mudflows produced
during the Holocene followed
similar paths from the Santa Ynez
Mountains to the north.
Indeed, the recent soil survey map
of the area nicely delineates
the Concepcion series (Cg),
characterized by the gray layer, in
the form of lobate fans headed in
the intermediate drainages
(Fig. 10).
The gray layer is absent from some of the interfluves where
Diablo clay (Da) is mapped (Figs.
10, 11). In these areas the
vertisol remains unburied by the
young mudflow and continues to
shrink and swell with the annual
changes in moisture. The young
mudflows, having been intercepted by
headward-eroding arroyos
(Fig. 12) and lacking sufficient
capacity to fill them, failed to
invade these terrace surfaces.
It is clear, then, that hypotheses 1 (pedogenesis) and 2
(aeolian deposition) should be
rejected, and that hypothesis 3,
mudflow deposition, best explains
the characteristics of the
Concepcion soil and its
distribution. The implications are that
the gray layer is very young and
does not contain an albic
horizon or A2 horizon formed
through pedogenesis. Instead, the
light gray horizon that occurs at
the base of the thickest
mudflow deposits is just what the
good book (Soil Survey Staff,
1975, p. 44) says it is:
"parent material," that is, a C horizon.
The Concepcion series is an excellent
example of the initial
development of a bisequum: a soil
profile containing two
superimposed sets of genetically
related soil horizons.
RECENCY OF FAULTING AT POINT CONCEPTION
The young mudflow, alias the "gray layer," is
crucial for
dating the most recent fault
movement at the proposed site for an
LNG terminal (Fig. 1). North-south compression in this part of
the Transverse Ranges has produced
a parallel series of bedding
plane faults within the south limb
of an anticline in the
actively folding Sisquoc Formation
(Dames & Moore, 1980; Rice and
others, 1982). At Arroyo Central an 80,000 year-old wavecut
platform and its associated marine
sand deposits have been offset
almost a meter along a structure now
known as the Arroyo fault.
Shears extend through the overlying
continental deposits and into
the base of of the Concepcion loam
described above (Figs. 13,
14). The footwall below one of these shears contains a
moderately well-developed B horizon;
the headwall contains a
slightly weathered C horizon. The offset of the B horizon is
roughly 35 cm, and, as recognized
previously by Yerkes and others
(1981, p. 5), the overlying mudflow
is "the only geologic or
pedologic unit apparently not displaced
over the Arroyo fault."
Dating the Mudflow
No direct date is available for the mudflow overlying the
vertisol in the Concepcion soil,
but it is unlikely that the soil
carbon within it is more than 500
years old. Charcoal from the
basal C horizon of the Concepcion
soil has been dated at 11,745
B.P. (Geochron Lab. No. GX-5569,
Shlemon, 1978, p. A-9). We
obtained a soil carbon date of
4,330 +_190 B.P. (Isotopes Lab. No.
I-11,121) for the top 10 cm of the
vertisol buried by a 60 cm-
thick mudflow in the northeast
corner of trench S-B excavated by
Dames & Moore (1980; Fig. 1 and
near the site of Fig. 4). An
assessment of the soil carbon date
is complicated because it
represents a mean residence time
(MRT) (Yaalon, 1971) plus a
burial time. That is, it consists of carbon that was
accumulating throughout the entire
period that the vertisol
remained unburied by the
mudflow. Soil carbon sampled at greater
depths in the vertisol undoubtedly
would give even older dates
(Yaalon, 1971, p. 83). This is because, even in vertisols, the
most recently deposited plant
remains are unlikely to be
throughly represented at
depth. Thus the 4,330 B.P. date
provides a minimum for mean residence
time and burial time for
soil carbon in the vertisol.
Based upon relative soil development and the aforementioned
propensity of the Concepcion soil
to act as a crude "sodium
chronometer," we estimate the
vertisol portion of the two-story
soil to have undergone at least ten
times as much soil
development as the mudflow
portion. Assuming a 10:1 development
ratio, the charcoal date yields a
maximum age of 1,068 B.P.
(11,745 B.P./11) and the soil
carbon date yields a minimum age of